<scp>PhoR</scp> autokinase activity is controlled by an intermediate in wall teichoic acid metabolism that is sensed by the intracellular <scp>PAS</scp> domain during the <scp>PhoPR</scp>‐mediated phosphate limitation response of <scp><i>B</i></scp><i>acillus subtilis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The PhoPR two-component signal transduction system controls one of the major responses to phosphate limitation in Bacillus subtilis. When activated it directs expression of phosphate scavenging enzymes, lowers synthesis of the phosphate-rich wall teichoic acid (WTA) and initiates synthesis of teichuronic acid, a non-phosphate containing replacement anionic polymer. Despite extensive knowledge of this response, the signal to which PhoR responds has not been identified. Here we report that one of the main functions of the PhoPR two-component system in B. subtilis is to monitor WTA metabolism. PhoR autokinase activity is controlled by the level of an intermediate in WTA synthesis that is sensed through the intracellular PAS domain. The pool of this intermediate generated by WTA synthesis in cells growing under phosphate-replete conditions is sufficient to inhibit PhoR autokinase activity. However WTA synthesis is lowered upon phosphate limitation by the combined effects of PhoP ∼ P-mediated activation of tuaA-H transcription and repression of tagAB. These transcriptional changes combine to lower the level of the inhibitory WTA metabolite thereby increasing PhoR autokinase activity. This amplifies the PHO response with full induction being achieved ∼ 90 min after the onset of phosphate limitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".