Candidate Genes and Adaptive Radiation: Insights from Transcriptional Adaptation to the Limnetic Niche among Coregonine Fishes (Coregonus spp., Salmonidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past 40 years, there has been increasing acceptance that variation in levels of gene expression represents a major source of evolutionary novelty. Gene expression divergence is therefore likely to be involved in the emergence of incipient species, namely, in a context of adaptive radiation. In the lake whitefish species complex (Coregonus clupeaformis), previous microarray experiments have led to the identification of candidate genes potentially implicated in the parallel evolution of the limnetic dwarf lake whitefish, which is highly distinct from the benthic normal lake whitefish in life history, morphology, metabolism, and behavior, and yet diverged from it only approximately 15,000 years before present. The aim of the present study was to address transcriptional divergence for six candidate genes among lake whitefish and European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) species pairs, as well as lake cisco (Coregonus artedi) and vendace (Coregonus albula). The main goal was to test the hypothesis that parallel phenotypic adaptation toward the use of the limnetic niche in coregonine fishes is accompanied by parallelism in candidate gene transcription as measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results obtained for three candidate genes, whereby parallelism in expression was observed across all whitefish species pairs, provide strong support for the hypothesis that divergent natural selection plays an important role in the adaptive radiation of whitefish species. However, this parallelism in expression did not extend to cisco and vendace, thereby infirming transcriptional convergence between limnetic whitefish species and their limnetic congeners for these genes. As recently proposed (Lynch 2007a. The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes. Nat Rev Genet. 8:803-813), these results may suggest that convergent phenotypic evolution can result from nonadaptive shaping of genome architecture in independently evolved coregonine lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".