MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155642639 · doi:10.1139/g00-053

Ubiquity of the St chloroplast genome in St-containing Triticeae polyploids

2000· article· en· W2155642639 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Margaret G. Redinbaugh, Thomas A. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriticeaeNdhFBiologyPolyploidGenomeChloroplast DNAPloidyNuclear DNAGeneticsNuclear geneNon-Mendelian inheritanceBotanyGeneMitochondrial DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interspecific hybridization occurs between Tritceae species in the grass family (Poaceae) giving rise to allopolyploid species. To examine bias in cytoplasmic DNA inheritance in these hybridizations, the sequence of the 3' end of the chloroplast ndhF gene was compared among 29 allopolyploid Triticeae species containing the St nuclear genome in combination with the H, I, Ns, P, W, Y, and Xm nuclear genomes. These ndhF sequences were also compared with those from diploid or allotetraploid Triticeae species having the H, I, Ns, P, W, St, and Xm genomes. The cpDNA sequences were highly similar among diploid, allotetraploid, allohexaploid, and allooctoploid Triticeae accessions containing the St nuclear genome, with 0-6-nucleotide (nt) substitutions (0-0.8%) occurring between pairs of species. Neighbor-joining analysis of the sequences showed that the ndhF DNA sequences from species containing the St nuclear genome formed a strongly supported clade. The data indicated a strong preference for cpDNA inheritance from the St nuclear genome-containing parent in hybridizations between Triticeae species. This preference was independent of the presence of the H, I, Ns, P, W, and Xm nuclear genomes, the geographic distribution of the species, and the mode of reproduction. The data suggests that hybridizations having the St-containing parent as the female may be more successful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207