MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156806928 · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgq255

Estrogen receptor α-mediated transcription induces cell cycle-dependent DNA double-strand breaks

2010· article· en· W2156806928 on OpenAlexafffund
Laura M. Williamson, Susan P. Lees‐Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsRAD51BiologyEstrogen receptorMolecular biologyEstrogenHomologous recombinationChromatinAphidicolinChromatin immunoprecipitationDNA damageCancer researchDNA replicationDNACell biologyPromoterGeneGene expressionBiochemistryGeneticsCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prolonged exposure to estrogen increases breast cancer risk. Estrogen is known to induce chromosomal aberrations, yet the mechanisms by which estrogen promotes genomic instability are not fully understood. Here, we show that exposure of MCF-7 cells to 17β-estradiol (E2) induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), as determined by the formation of γH2AX foci. Foci formation was dependent upon estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and the catalytic activity of the type II topoisomerase, topoisomerase IIβ (topoIIβ). Moreover, we show by chromatin immunoprecipitation that topoIIβ-dependent E2-induced γH2AX localizes to the promoter of the estrogen-inducible gene, trefoil factor 1. E2-induced foci were associated with cyclin A expression and inhibited by pre-incubation with the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin suggesting that E2-induced DSBs are mediated by progression through S phase. Furthermore, E2-induced γH2AX foci colocalized with Rad51, suggesting that E2-induced DSBs are repaired by homologous recombination. We propose that DNA DSBs formed by the strand-cleaving activity of the topoIIβ-DNA cleavage complex at estrogen-inducible genes can present a barrier to DNA replication, leading to persistent DNA DSBs in ERα-positive breast cancer cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarcinogenesisSame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207