Effects of bacteriophage on the surface properties of chalcopyrite (CuFeS<sub>2</sub>), and phage‐induced flocculation of chalcopyrite, glacial till, and oil sands tailings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding of mineral-specific phage to the surface of chalcopyrite (CuFeS(2)) was investigated by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning Auger microscopy. These studies confirmed the elemental composition of the minerals and confirmed that bacteriophage were bound to the mineral surface. These techniques also revealed that the phage were not forming a continuous film over the entire surface of the CuFeS(2) particles, but selectively bound to the slimes coating the particles. In addition, the effect of mineral-specific phage binding to the surface of CuFeS(2) was investigated using induction time and zeta potential measurements. Bacteriophage (10(12) /mL) increased the induction time (contact time resulting in 50% particle attachment to a bubble) from ∼7.5 to ∼17 ms and reversed the zeta potential from negative to positive. In the course of performing the zeta potential measurements on particles <45 µm in diameter, phage-induced aggregation was observed. The mechanism of aggregation was explored using a range of pH (3-11) and cation concentrations. Aggregation was observed across the tested pH range and with all cations. Phage also mediated aggregation of glacial till and oil sands tailings in a dose-dependent and particle size-dependent manner. We conclude that binding of bacteriophage to the surface of CuFeS(2) does alter its surface properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".