Incremental Inverse Kinematics of Wire-Suspended Parallel Mechanical System Taking into Account Many-Worlds Situation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wire-suspended platform is a parallel mechanical system consisting of a rigid platform and a number of length-adjustable wires. In order to deal with the kinematics of this type of mechanical system, we have to take into account the conspicuous characteristic of a wire that it can take only a tensile force. It has been demonstrated in the previous studies that this leads to plural possible kinematic states corresponding to a given set of wire lengths. In this study, we formulate an inverse kinematics problem in an incremental form based on the linearization of the kinematic relation of the system. Displacement of the mass center position of the platform is also taken into account for the articulation variables, in addition to the wire member lengths. A solution procedure that deals with the many-worlds situation is developed under the assumption of some adequate sensing devices. Numerical experiments based on computer simulation are carried out and the feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated with the attained kinematic motions of the simulated platform system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".