MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Absolute Bioavailability and Disposition of (−) and (+) 2′-Deoxy- 3′-Oxa-4′-Thiocytidine (dOTC) following Single Intravenous and Oral Doses of Racemic dOTC in Humans

2000· article· en· W2159036513 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick F. Smith, Alan Forrest, Charles H. Ballow, David E. Martin, L. Proulx

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsBioPhage Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacokineticsChemistryBioavailabilityVolume of distributionSteady state (chemistry)Coefficient of variationPharmacologyChromatographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and determine the absolute bioavailability of 2'-deoxy-3'-oxa-4'-thiocytidine (dOTC) (BCH-10652), a novel nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in humans. dOTC belongs to the 4'-thio heterosubstituted class of compounds and is a 1:1 mixture of its two enantiomers, (-) and (+) dOTC. Twelve healthy adult male volunteers each received oral (800-mg) and intravenous (100-mg) doses of dOTC in two study periods separated by at least 7 days. Sixteen plasma samples were obtained over 72 h and assayed for (-) and (+) dOTC, and the resultant data fit by candidate pharmacokinetic models. Data were weighted by the fitted inverse of the observation variance; model discrimination was by AIC. The pharmacokinetic model was a linear, three compartment model, with absorption occurring during one to three first-order input phases, each following a fitted lag time. The model goodness-of-fit was excellent; r(2) ranged from 0.995 to 1.0. The mean absolute bioavailabilities of (+) and (-) dOTC were 77.2% (coefficient of variation [given as a percentage] [CV%], 14) and 80.7% (CV%, 15), respectively. The median steady-state volume of distribution for (+) dOTC, 74.7 (CV%, 19.2) liters/65 kg, was greater than that for (-) dOTC, 51.7 (CV%, 16.7) liters/65 kg (P<0.05). The median total clearance of (+) dOTC was less than that of (-) dOTC, 11.7 (CV%, 17.3) versus 15.4 (CV%, 18.6) liters/h/65 kg, respectively (P< 0.05). The intersubject variability of these parameters was very low. The median terminal half-life of (+) dOTC was 18.0 (CV%, 31.5) h, significantly longer than the 6.8 (CV%, 69.9) h observed for (-) dOTC (P<0.01). No serious adverse events were reported during the study. These results suggest that dOTC is well absorbed, widely distributed, and well tolerated. The terminal half-lives indicate that dosing intervals of 12 to 24 h would be reasonable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207