Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis of α4, a Putative Pore-Lining Helix of the <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> Insecticidal Toxin Cry1Aa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helix alpha4 of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins is thought to line the lumen of the pores they form in the midgut epithelial cells of susceptible insect larvae. To define its functional role in pore formation, most of the alpha4 amino acid residues were replaced individually by a cysteine in the Cry1Aa toxin. The toxicities and pore-forming abilities of the mutated toxins were examined, respectively, by bioassays using neonate Manduca sexta larvae and by a light-scattering assay using midgut brush border membrane vesicles isolated from M. sexta. A majority of these mutants had considerably reduced toxicities and pore-forming abilities. Most mutations causing substantial or complete loss of activity map on the hydrophilic face of the helix, while most of those having little or only relatively minor effects map on its hydrophobic face. The properties of the pores formed by mutants that retain significant activity appear similar to those of the pores formed by the wild-type toxin, suggesting that mutations resulting in a loss of activity interfere mainly with pore formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".