MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2159692922 · doi:10.1038/srep08278

Targeted Sequencing in Chromosome 17q Linkage Region Identifies Familial Glioma Candidates in the Gliogene Consortium

2015· article· en· W2159692922 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Jalali, E. Susan Amirian, Matthew N. Bainbridge, Georgina Armstrong, Yanhong Liu, Spyros Tsavachidis, Shalini N. Jhangiani, Sharon E. Plon, Ching C. Lau, Elizabeth B. Claus, Jill S. Barnholtz‐Sloan, Dora Il’yasova, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Francis Ali‐Osman, Siegal Sadetzki, Christoffer Johansen, Richard S. Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Daniel H. Lachance, Sara H. Olson, Jonine L. Bernstein, Ryan Merrell, Margaret Wrensch, Faith G. Davis, Rose Lai, Sanjay Shete, Kenneth Aldape, Christopher I. Amos, Donna M. Muzny, Richard A. Gibbs, Beatrice Melin, Melissa L. Bondy

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Brain Tumor SocietyU.S. Public Health ServiceNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Human Genome Research InstituteAmerican Brain Tumor Association
KeywordsSanger sequencingGeneticsGliomaBiologyGenetic linkageLocus (genetics)ChromosomeCandidate geneLinkage (software)GeneComputational biologyDNA sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioma is a rare, but highly fatal, cancer that accounts for the majority of malignant primary brain tumors. Inherited predisposition to glioma has been consistently observed within non-syndromic families. Our previous studies, which involved non-parametric and parametric linkage analyses, both yielded significant linkage peaks on chromosome 17q. Here, we use data from next generation and Sanger sequencing to identify familial glioma candidate genes and variants on chromosome 17q for further investigation. We applied a filtering schema to narrow the original list of 4830 annotated variants down to 21 very rare (<0.1% frequency), non-synonymous variants. Our findings implicate the MYO19 and KIF18B genes and rare variants in SPAG9 and RUNDC1 as candidates worthy of further investigation. Burden testing and functional studies are planned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207