MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Tiotropium on Hyperinflation and Treadmill Exercise Tolerance in Mild to Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2014· article· en· W2162128059 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Casaburi, François Maltais, János Pórszász, Frank C. Albers, Qiqi Deng, Ahmar Iqbal, Heather Paden, Denis E. O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDTiotropium bromidePlaceboDynamic hyperinflationInternal medicineCardiologyBronchodilatorClinical endpointCrossover studyObstructive lung diseaseHyperinflationAnesthesiaPhysical therapyLung volumesRandomized controlled trialLungLung functionAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Bronchodilator therapy represents a potentially valuable therapeutic option to increase exercise tolerance and enhance lung function in mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES: To determine effects of tiotropium on pulmonary hyperinflation and exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 1 and 2 COPD who experienced inspiratory capacity decrease greater than or equal to 100 ml during incremental and constant work rate treadmill exercise. METHODS: This 22-week, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study evaluated the efficacy of once-daily tiotropium bromide (18 μg) versus placebo in patients with GOLD 1 and 2 COPD. Primary endpoint was between-group (tiotropium vs. placebo) difference in inspiratory capacity at isotime (i.e., at the time the shortest test ended) during constant work rate treadmill exercise from baseline to the end of a 6-week treatment period. Key secondary endpoints included differences in exercise duration and exertional dyspnea. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Study population comprised 48 patients with GOLD 1 COPD and 78 patients with GOLD 2 COPD. Resting inspiratory capacity significantly improved with tiotropium versus placebo in the overall (P < 0.0001), GOLD 1 (P = 0.0183), and GOLD 2 (P < 0.0001) groups. Isotime inspiratory capacity was significantly enhanced during exercise in the overall (P = 0.0087) and GOLD 2 (P = 0.0494) groups after tiotropium versus placebo. Tiotropium versus placebo significantly enhanced exercise duration in the GOLD 2 group (P = 0.0070) but not in the GOLD 1 or overall patient groups. In the overall group, increase in exercise duration seen with tiotropium was well correlated with the increase in isotime inspiratory capacity (r = 0.463, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Resting and exercise hyperinflation were ameliorated by bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium in the overall GOLD 1 plus 2 COPD group. Exercise tolerance was enhanced in GOLD 2, but not GOLD 1, COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01072396).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207