Effects of Tiotropium on Hyperinflation and Treadmill Exercise Tolerance in Mild to Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Bronchodilator therapy represents a potentially valuable therapeutic option to increase exercise tolerance and enhance lung function in mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES: To determine effects of tiotropium on pulmonary hyperinflation and exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 1 and 2 COPD who experienced inspiratory capacity decrease greater than or equal to 100 ml during incremental and constant work rate treadmill exercise. METHODS: This 22-week, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study evaluated the efficacy of once-daily tiotropium bromide (18 μg) versus placebo in patients with GOLD 1 and 2 COPD. Primary endpoint was between-group (tiotropium vs. placebo) difference in inspiratory capacity at isotime (i.e., at the time the shortest test ended) during constant work rate treadmill exercise from baseline to the end of a 6-week treatment period. Key secondary endpoints included differences in exercise duration and exertional dyspnea. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Study population comprised 48 patients with GOLD 1 COPD and 78 patients with GOLD 2 COPD. Resting inspiratory capacity significantly improved with tiotropium versus placebo in the overall (P < 0.0001), GOLD 1 (P = 0.0183), and GOLD 2 (P < 0.0001) groups. Isotime inspiratory capacity was significantly enhanced during exercise in the overall (P = 0.0087) and GOLD 2 (P = 0.0494) groups after tiotropium versus placebo. Tiotropium versus placebo significantly enhanced exercise duration in the GOLD 2 group (P = 0.0070) but not in the GOLD 1 or overall patient groups. In the overall group, increase in exercise duration seen with tiotropium was well correlated with the increase in isotime inspiratory capacity (r = 0.463, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Resting and exercise hyperinflation were ameliorated by bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium in the overall GOLD 1 plus 2 COPD group. Exercise tolerance was enhanced in GOLD 2, but not GOLD 1, COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01072396).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".