Potent Immunosuppression by a Bivalent Molecule Binding to CD200R and TGF-βR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The novel immunosuppressive molecule, CD200, has been reported to induce immunoregulation after interaction with its receptor(s), CD200R(s), in part at least through augmented induction of regulatory T-cell populations. Independent studies have also described increased expression of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase after CD200R triggering, whereas others have provided evidence that TGF-beta is important for the induction or function of many populations of regulatory T cells. We have asked whether a hybrid molecule in which a soluble fusion protein containing CD200, CD200Fc, was linked to TGF-beta through a glycine linker (Gly6) functions as a superior immunosuppressant molecule when compared with CD200Fc or TGF-beta alone, or in combination. METHODS: The hybrid molecule CD200FcGly6TGF-beta was expressed by transient transfection in CHO cells and purified over a protein A column. Functional activity of this and recombinant CD200Fc or TGF-beta alone were assessed in mixed leukocyte cultures (MLCs) and in skin graft rejection in vivo. RESULTS: Immunosuppression mediated by CD200FcGly6TGF-beta is dependent on both functional CD200 and TGF-beta moieties, as indicated by inhibition of suppression using anti-CD200 or anti-TGF-beta antibodies. Using as responder cells, using antigen-presenting cell from mice with a deletion of the CD200R gene and responder T cells from mice with siRNA-mediated suppression of expression of the TGF-betaII receptor, we show that suppression follows binding to TGF-betaRII on T cells, and CD200R1 on antigen-presenting cells. Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors did not attenuate suppression by CD200FcGly6TGF-beta. CONCLUSION: CD200FcGly6TGF-beta is a potent immunosuppressant in vivo and in vitro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".