← all works
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Abstract
Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- BMJ
- Topic
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- McMaster University
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Quality of evidenceQuality (philosophy)Consensus conferenceComputer scienceEvidence-based medicineRating systemMedicineData scienceAlternative medicineMeta-analysisPathologyEnvironmental economicsEconomicsLibrary science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes