Cyclic enkephalin analogs containing various <i>para</i>‐substituted phenylalanine derivatives in place of Tyr<sup>1</sup> are potent opioid agonists*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cyclic enkephalin analog H-Tyr-c[D-Cys-Gly-Phe(pNO(2))-D-Cys]NH(2) is a highly potent opioid agonist with IC(50)s of 35 pm and 19 pm in the guinea-pig ileum (GPI) and mouse vas deferens (MVD) assays, respectively. The Phe(1)-analog of this peptide showed 370-fold and 6790-fold lower agonist potency in the GPI and MVD assays, respectively, indicating the importance of the Tyr(1) hydroxyl-group in the interaction with mu and delta opioid receptors. In the present study, the effect of various substituents (-NH(2), -NO(2), -CN, -CH(3), -COOH, -COCH(3), -CONH(2)) introduced in the para-position of the Phe(1)-residue of H-Phe-c[D-Cys-Gly-Phe(pNO(2))-D-Cys]NH(2) on the in vitro opioid activity profile was examined. Most analogs showed enhanced mu and delta agonist potencies in the two bioassays, except for the Phe(pCOOH)(1)-analog, which was weakly active, probably as a consequence of the negative charge. The most potent compounds were the Phe(pCOH(3))(1)- and the Phe(pCONH(2))(1)-analogs. The latter compound showed subnanomolar mu and delta agonist potencies and represents the most potent enkephalin analog lacking the Tyr(1) hydroxyl-group reported to date. Taken together, these results indicate that various substituents introduced in the para-position of Phe(1) enhance opioid activity via hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interactions with the receptor. Comparison with existing structure-activity relationship on phenolic hydroxyl replacements in morphinans indicates that these nonpeptide opiates and some of the cyclic enkephalin analogs described here may have different modes of binding to the receptor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".