Liposomal encapsulation of vancomycin improves killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine infection model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a major problem to public health worldwide. MRSA strains with increased resistance to vancomycin cause infections that are associated with greater morbidity and threaten the use of this once gold-standard antistaphylococcal drug. We investigated whether encapsulation of vancomycin within liposomes could improve its antistaphylococcal activity. METHODS: Two liposomal formulations of vancomycin were prepared using a rehydration-dehydration method. MICs and MBCs of the liposomal vancomycin for strains of MRSA were determined. The efficacy of one of the liposomal vancomycin formulations was also investigated in a time-kill assay in vitro and in a murine systemic infection model. RESULTS: Encapsulation in either liposome preparation decreased the vancomycin MICs and MBCs for MRSA strains by approximately 2-fold. Liposomal vancomycin increased killing of MRSA in vitro in a kinetic study. In a systemic murine infection model, treatment with a 50 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection of liposomal vancomycin improved kidney clearance of a USA300 strain by 1 log compared with an injection of 50 mg/kg of free vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that entrapment within liposomes could improve the antistaphylococcal efficacy of vancomycin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it