MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169350000 · doi:10.1139/x02-041

Response of the natural abundance of<sup>15</sup>N in forest soils and foliage to high nitrate loss following clear-cutting

2002· article· en· W2169350000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linda H. Pardo, Harold F. Hemond, Joseph P. Montoya, Timothy J. Fahey, Thomas G. Siccama

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAndrew W. Mellon Foundation
KeywordsNitrificationNitrateSoil waterClearcuttingAmmoniumWatershedEcosystemSoil horizonEnvironmental scienceNitrogenHydrology (agriculture)Experimental forestAnimal scienceOrganic matterPodzolEnvironmental chemistryChemistryAgronomySoil scienceEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Export of microbially produced nitrate from an ecosystem is expected to increase δ 15 N in the remaining soil organic matter and NH 4 + . To test the hypothesis that nitrification and nitrate loss induced by clear-cutting cause an increase in soil and foliar δ 15 N, we measured δ 15 N in a clear-cut watershed at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. δ 15 N ranged from –0.02‰ in the Oie horizon to 7.7‰ in the Bs2 horizon prior to clear-cutting and increased significantly by 1.3‰ in the Oie horizon and 0.9‰ in the Oa horizon 3 years after clear-cutting. Fifteen years after clear-cutting, δ 15 N in both O horizons decreased to near-initial values. No significant temporal changes in the Bs2 and C horizons δ 15 N were observed. Foliar δ 15 N was highest (1.7‰) the first 2 years after clear-cutting and was significantly higher than in the reference watershed (mean δ 15 N = –1.2‰), decreasing to 0.0‰ 3–5 years after clear-cutting and to –1.3‰ 9–11 years after clear-cutting. Increased foliar δ 15 N coincided with increased stream-water nitrate concentration, suggesting that the increased nitrification responsible for elevated stream-water nitrate may also have caused an enrichment of the plant-available ammonium pool. The response observed in this catchment also suggests that sampling of soil or foliar δ 15 N may provide a practical alternative to long time series of stream chemistry for evaluating nitrogen saturation of forested ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations121
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207