MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Retraction

2012· article· en· W2169359596 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin D. Hedley, Carolina Phay, Ian Chin‐Yee, Wendy Brown, M. Keeney

Post-publication record

NatureRetraction
ReasonCopyright Claims;Objections by Third Party;Removed;
Date4/23/2012 0:00
Flagged by OpenAlex?Yes

Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Laboratory Hematology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlaggingHematology analyzerSpectrum analyzerFalse positive paradoxFalse positive rateMedicineNuclear medicineMathematicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)StatisticsPathologyChromatographyOpticsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The Beckman Coulter DxH 300™ is a hematology analyzer that performs a CBC and 3-part WBC differential and incorporates new electronic, algorithm and mechanical design. METHODS: This instrument was compared with the predicate analyzer (Coulter(®) A(c) ·Tdiff2) and the larger format Coulter LH780 analyzer. Of interest were flagging rates, clinical sensitivity, and accuracy of the WBC in the presence of interfering particles. The total sample set (n = 404) consisted of morphologically normal and hematologically abnormal patients. RESULTS: Correlation of the DxH 300 with A(c) ·Tdiff2™ showed good agreement with all directly measured parameters. When compared with the LH780, WBC and platelets (PLT) counts showed good agreement with small biases. Importantly in the low range (PLT <50 × 10(9) /L), there was a small positive bias of only 2 × 10(9) /L PLT. Interfering particles did not affect the DxH 300 WBC count (P > 0.05) with strong correlations to the LH780 (r(2) values >0.95). Importantly, overall and specific flagging rates as well as false-negative and false-positive rates were significantly reduced on the DxH 300 compared with the A(c) ·Tdiff2 (27% and 41% reduction, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DxH 300 offers significant improvement over the predicate Coulter analyzer in flagging rates and improved correlation with larger format analyzers for WBC and PLT counts. Reduced false negatives and false positives significantly improved sensitivity and specificity compared to the predicate analyzer. The 28% improvement in flagging efficiency together with numerous software and data handling enhancements should translate into reduced need to perform follow-up analysis on a significant number of samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3770.221

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Laboratory HematologySame topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207