Heparan sulfate as a therapeutic target in amyloidogenesis: prospects and possible complications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amyloid formation in vivo is a much more complicated process than studies of in vitro protein/peptide fibrillogenesis would lead one to believe. Amyloidogenesis in vivo involves multiple components, some no less important than the amyloidogenic protein/peptides themselves, and each of these components, and its role in the pathogenetic steps toward amyloid deposition could, theoretically, be a therapeutic target. Herein we use the definition of amyloid as it was originally described, discuss the similarities and differences between amyloid in vivo and in vitro, address the potential role of the extracellular matrix in in vivo amyloidogenesis by focusing on a specific component, namely heparan sulfate proteoglycan, and describe studies illustrating that heparan sulfate is a valid target for anti-amyloid therapy. In light of experimental and recent clinical results obtained from studies addressing heparan sulfate's role in amyloid deposition additional novel anti-amyloid therapeutic targets will be proposed. Lastly, given the multiple roles that heparan sulfate plays in organ development, and organ and cell function, potential side effects of targeting heparan sulfate biosynthesis for therapeutic purposes are considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".