Assembly of the MexAB-OprM Multidrug Efflux System of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> : Identification and Characterization of Mutations in <i>mexA</i> Compromising MexA Multimerization and Interaction with MexB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The membrane fusion protein (MFP) component, MexA, of the MexAB-OprM multidrug efflux system of P. aeruginosa is proposed to link the inner (MexB) and outer (OprM) membrane components of this pump as a probable oligomer. A cross-linking approach confirmed the in vivo interaction of MexA and MexB, while a LexA-based assay for assessing protein-protein interaction similarly confirmed MexA multimerization. Mutations compromising the MexA contribution to antibiotic resistance but yielding wild-type levels of MexA were recovered and shown to map to two distinct regions within the N- and C-terminal halves of the protein. Most of the N-terminal mutations occurred at residues that are highly conserved in the MFP family (P68, G72, L91, A108, L110, and V129), consistent with these playing roles in a common feature of these proteins (e.g., oligomerization). In contrast, the majority of the C-terminal mutations occurred at residues poorly conserved in the MFP family (V264, N270, H279, V286, and G297), with many mapping to a region of MexA that corresponds to a region in the related MFP of Escherichia coli, AcrA, that is implicated in binding to its RND component, AcrB (C. A. Elkins and H. Nikaido, J. Bacteriol. 185:5349-5356, 2003). Given the noted specificity of MFP-RND interaction in this family of pumps, residues unique to MexA may well be important for and define the MexA interaction with its RND component, MexB. Still, all but one of the MexA mutations studied compromised MexA-MexB association, suggesting that native structure and/or proper assembly of the protein may be necessary for this.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".