Mutational Analysis of the CYP2B2 Phenobarbital Response Unit and Inhibitory Effect of the Constitutive Androstane Receptor on Phenobarbital Responsiveness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 163-base pair enhancer in the CYP2B2 5' flank confers phenobarbital (PB) inducibility and constitutes a PB response unit (PBRU). By transfection of primary hepatocytes, we analyzed the function of elements comprising the PBRU and evaluated the role of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in PB responsiveness. A 51-base pair PB-responsive enhancer module (PBREM) within the PBRU confers near-maximal PB response when fused to a tk promoter. However, replacing the PBRU with the PBREM in the CYP2B2 5' flank in the natural sequence context reduced PB responsiveness by approximately 4-fold. Mutational analysis also demonstrated that PBRU sequence elements outside the PBREM are essential for maximal PB responsiveness. The PBRU contains two putative nuclear receptor binding sites, NR1 and NR2. CAR binds to retinoic acid beta2 response elements (betaRARE) and to the NR1 and NR2 sites of the PBRU and activates transcription of reporter genes in cell lines. However, conversion of NR1 into betaRARE was the equivalent of an inactivating mutation, indicating that CAR does not activate PB-dependent transcription via NR1 in the natural sequence context. A betaRAREx2-tk reporter construct was inducible by all-trans-retinoic acid (at-RA) as expected and also responded to PB. The latter can be attributed to nuclear accumulation of CAR after PB exposure. Exogenous CAR increased both the basal and PB-induced response of betaRAREx2-tk but reduced PBRU-dependent PB response. Furthermore, exogenous CAR also reduced the at-RA response of the betaRAREx2-tk construct. Thus, CAR acts negatively on PB responsiveness mediated by the CYP2B2 PBRU just as it prevents maximal at-RA responsiveness mediated by betaRARE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".