Characterization of a stable, hypertensive rat model suitable for the consecutive evaluation of human renin inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The hypertensive double-transgenic (dTG) rat strain, expressing human renin and angiotensinogen, develops severe hypertension and organ damage and 50% of individuals die by 7 weeks of age. Here, we characterise a variation of this model in which animals present stable hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of renin-angiotensin system blockers on blood pressure was determined with adult dTG rats treated with enalapril from 3 to 12 weeks of age. Tissue expression levels of renin and angiotensinogen were determined in dTG rats and rhesus monkeys by quantitative PCR. RESULTS: Upon withdrawal from enalapril, mean arterial pressure (MAP) rose to 160-180 mmHg, with 95% of the female dTG rats surviving for 6 to 12 months, In Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and rhesus monkeys, renin mRNA was absent or weakly expressed in most tissues, except for the kidneys and adrenals. In dTG rats, human renin expression was high in many additional tissues. The expression of human angiotensinogen in dTG rats followed a similar tissue pattern to SD and rhesus monkey angiotensinogen. Oral dosing of aliskiren, enalapril or losartan provided a similar maximal reduction in MAP and duration of efficacy in telemetrised dTG rats. CONCLUSIONS: Enalapril-pretreated dTG rats are suitable for long-term MAP monitoring and sequential evaluation of human renin inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".