MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2174346028 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2013-0047

Intron retention: a human <i>DKC1</i> gene common splicing event

2013· article· en· W2174346028 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mimmo Turano, Alberto Angrisani, Nunzia Di Maio, Maria Furia

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyIntronGeneDyskeratosis congenitaGeneticsAlternative splicingGene isoformRNA splicingNonsense-mediated decayGene expressionTelomereRNACell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identification of alternatively spliced transcripts produced by a gene is a crucial step in deciphering the bulk of its biological roles and the overall processes that regulate its activity. By using a combination of bioinformatic and molecular approaches we identified, cloned, and characterized 3 novel alternative splice isoforms derived from human dyskeratosis congenita 1 (hDKC1), an essential human gene causative of the X-linked dyskeratosis congenita disease and involved in multiple functions related to cell growth, proliferation, and telomere maintenance. Expression of the new isoforms, all characterized by intron retention, was confirmed by RT-PCR in a panel of diverse cell lines and normal human tissues, and despite the presence of premature termination codons, was not down-regulated by the mechanism of nonsense-mediated decay. Accumulation of these transcripts fluctuated distinctly in the diverse tissues and during in vitro differentiation of Caco2 cells, suggesting that their ratio may contribute to the gene functional diversity across different cell types. Intriguingly, the structure of one isoform leads to exonize an intronically encoded small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), highlighting an additional layer of complexity that can contribute to overall gene regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207