MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183448877

Influence of variety, wine style, vintage and viticultural area on selected chemical parameters of Canadian Icewine

2007· article· en· W2183448877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George J. Soleas, Gary J. Pickering

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Agriculture & Environment · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTanninPhytic acidChemistryPhosphorusOxalateDry matterChemical compositionComposition (language)Food scienceBotanyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dried loofah gourd (Luffa cylindrica L., M.J. Roem, syn. Luffa aegyptiaca Muell) seed were harvested and divided in two samples, viz., hull and dehulled. The samples were analyzed for proximate composition and mineral contents (Mg, Ca, Na, K, Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn). Tannin, oxalate, phytin phosphorus and phytic acid were the antinutritional factors evaluated. Some functional properties, such as oil absorption capacity (OAC), water absorption capacity (WAC), foaming capacity (FC), foaming stability (FS), emulsion stability (ES), least gelation concentration (LGC) and bulk density, were also investigated. The dry matter, crude protein and ether extract values were significantly higher (P 0.05). DLGSM was significantly lower in phytin phosphorus and oxalate but higher in tannin content (0.41%) than HLGSM with coefficient of variation (CV) of 20.79, 40.49 and 12.35% respectively. The phytic acid content in samples did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Contentrations of Mg, Ca, Na, Fe, Cu and Mn were significantly higher but Cu and Zn were lower in DLGSM. The highest coefficient of variation (59.65%) was recorded by Zn, followed by Mn (43.30%), Na (30.50%) and Ca (20.66%). There was no significant difference in the K values for DLGSM and HLGSM (P>0.05). The functional properties measured, such as OAC, EC, FS, ES and LGC, were not affected significantly. However, WAC and FC increased significantly (P<0.05) with CV of 30.01 and 33.22% while the bulk density was not affected (P<0.05). These values obtained for the DLGSM indicate the potential in its use as a source of vegetable protein in animal and human nutrition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food Agriculture & EnvironmentSame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207