Towards a biomechanics-based technique for assessing myocardial contractility: an inverse problem approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents the initial development and implementation of a novel 3D biomechanics-based approach to measure the mechanical activity of myocardial tissue, as a potential non-invasive tool to assess myocardial function. This technique quantifies the myocardial contraction forces developed within the ventricular myofibers in response to electro-physiological stimuli. We provide a 3D finite element formulation of a contraction force reconstruction algorithm, along with its implementation using magnetic resonance (MR) data. Our algorithm is based on an inverse problem solution governed by the fundamental continuum mechanics principle of conservation of linear momentum, under a first-order approximation of elastic and isotropic material conditions. We implemented our technique using a subject-specific ventricle model obtained by extracting the left ventricular anatomical features from a set of high-resolution cardiac MR images acquired throughout the cardiac cycle using prospective electrocardiographic gating. Cardiac motion information was extracted by non-rigid registration of the mid-diastole reference image to the remaining images of a 4D dataset. Using our technique, we reconstructed dynamic maps that show the contraction force distribution superimposed onto the deformed ventricle model at each acquired frame in the cardiac cycle. Our next objective will consist of validating this technique by showing the correlation between the presence of low contraction force patterns and poor myocardial functionality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".