MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204276469

Demarginalizing voices : commitment, emotion, and action in qualitative research

2015· article· en· W2204276469 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Teresa Anne Fowler

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPrisonReflexivityPostmodernismPsychoanalysisIdentity (music)Action (physics)Gender studiesCriminologyMedia studiesPsychologyAestheticsSocial scienceArtEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction / Jennifer M. Kilty, Maritza Felices-Luna, and Sheryl C. Fabian Part 1: Alternative Pathways: Opting for the Road Seldom Taken 1 Observing a Self-Chosen Death / Russel D. Ogden 2 Ensuring Aboriginal Women's Voices Are Heard: Toward a Balanced Approach in Community-Based Research / Catherine Fillmore, Colleen Anne Dell, and Jennifer M. Kilty 3 Commitment and Participation: A Collective Action to Defend the Rights of Homeless People against Anti-Disorder Policing Practices in Montreal / Celine Bellot, Marie-Eve Sylvestre, and Bernard St-Jacques 4 Dance in Prison: Narratives of the Body, Performativity, Methodology, and Criminology / Sylvie Frigon and Laura Shantz 5 Producing Feminist Knowledge: Lessons from the Past / Dorothy E. Chunn and Robert Menzies 6 The Evolution of Feminist Research in the Criminological Enterprise: The Canadian Experience / Jennifer M. Kilty Part 2 Ethical Quagmires: Regulating Qualitative Research 7 The Politics of Threats in Correctional and Forensic Settings: The Specificities of Nursing Research / Amelie Perron, Dave Holmes, and Jean Daniel Jacob 8 How Positivism Is Colonizing Qualitative Research through Ethics Review / Will C. van den Hoonaard 9 Fighting the Big Bad Wolf: Why All the Fuss about Ethics Review Boards? / Maritza Felices-Luna 10 Doublespeak and Double Standards: Holding a Rogue University Administration to Account / John Lowman and Ted Palys Part 3 Emotion Work and Identity: Self-Examination and Self-Awareness 11 Reconciling the Irreconcilable: Resolving Emotionality and Research Responsibility When Working for the Traumatizer / Sheryl C. Fabian 12 Grappling with Reflexivity and the Role of Emotion in Criminological Analysis / Stacey Hannem 13 Epistemological Violence, Psychological Whips, and Other Moments of Angst: Reflections on PhD Research / Melissa Munn 14 Activist Academic Whore: Negotiating the Fractured Otherness Abyss / Chris Bruckert Concluding Thoughts / Maritza Felices-Luna, Jennifer M. Kilty, and Sheryl C. Fabian Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.651
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.037 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFrench-language works237,207