Demarginalizing voices : commitment, emotion, and action in qualitative research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction / Jennifer M. Kilty, Maritza Felices-Luna, and Sheryl C. Fabian Part 1: Alternative Pathways: Opting for the Road Seldom Taken 1 Observing a Self-Chosen Death / Russel D. Ogden 2 Ensuring Aboriginal Women's Voices Are Heard: Toward a Balanced Approach in Community-Based Research / Catherine Fillmore, Colleen Anne Dell, and Jennifer M. Kilty 3 Commitment and Participation: A Collective Action to Defend the Rights of Homeless People against Anti-Disorder Policing Practices in Montreal / Celine Bellot, Marie-Eve Sylvestre, and Bernard St-Jacques 4 Dance in Prison: Narratives of the Body, Performativity, Methodology, and Criminology / Sylvie Frigon and Laura Shantz 5 Producing Feminist Knowledge: Lessons from the Past / Dorothy E. Chunn and Robert Menzies 6 The Evolution of Feminist Research in the Criminological Enterprise: The Canadian Experience / Jennifer M. Kilty Part 2 Ethical Quagmires: Regulating Qualitative Research 7 The Politics of Threats in Correctional and Forensic Settings: The Specificities of Nursing Research / Amelie Perron, Dave Holmes, and Jean Daniel Jacob 8 How Positivism Is Colonizing Qualitative Research through Ethics Review / Will C. van den Hoonaard 9 Fighting the Big Bad Wolf: Why All the Fuss about Ethics Review Boards? / Maritza Felices-Luna 10 Doublespeak and Double Standards: Holding a Rogue University Administration to Account / John Lowman and Ted Palys Part 3 Emotion Work and Identity: Self-Examination and Self-Awareness 11 Reconciling the Irreconcilable: Resolving Emotionality and Research Responsibility When Working for the Traumatizer / Sheryl C. Fabian 12 Grappling with Reflexivity and the Role of Emotion in Criminological Analysis / Stacey Hannem 13 Epistemological Violence, Psychological Whips, and Other Moments of Angst: Reflections on PhD Research / Melissa Munn 14 Activist Academic Whore: Negotiating the Fractured Otherness Abyss / Chris Bruckert Concluding Thoughts / Maritza Felices-Luna, Jennifer M. Kilty, and Sheryl C. Fabian Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.144 | 0.153 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".