Polyamine catabolism in platinum drug action: Interactions between oxaliplatin and the polyamine analogue <i>N</i>1,<i>N</i>11-diethylnorspermine at the level of spermidine/spermine <i>N</i>1-acetyltransferase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A great deal of experimental evidence connects induction of polyamine catabolism via spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) to antiproliferative activity and apoptosis. Following our initial observation from gene expression profiling that platinum drugs induce SSAT, we undertook this present study to characterize platinum drug induction of SSAT and other polyamine catabolic enzymes and to examine how these responses might be enhanced with the well-known inducer of SSAT and clinically relevant polyamine analogue, N1,N11-diethylnorspermine (DENSPM). The results obtained in A2780 ovarian cancer cells by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis show that a 2-hour exposure of A2780 cells to platinum drugs induces expression of SSAT, a second SSAT (SSAT-2), spermine oxidase, and polyamine oxidase in a dose-dependent manner. At equitoxic doses, oxaliplatin is more effective than cisplatin in SSAT induction. The most affected enzyme, SSAT, increased 15-fold in mRNA expression and 2-fold in enzyme activity. When combined with DENSPM to further induce SSAT and to enhance conversion of mRNA to activity, oxaliplatin increased SSAT mRNA 50-fold and activity, 210-fold. Polyamine pools declined in rough proportion to levels of SSAT induction. At pharmacologically relevant oxaliplatin exposure times (20 hours) and drug concentrations (5 to 15 micromol/L), these responses were increased even further. Combining low-dose DENSPM with oxaliplatin produced a greater than additive inhibition of cell growth based on the sulforhodamine-B assay. Taken together, the findings confirm potent induction of polyamine catabolic enzymes, such as SSAT by platinum drugs, and demonstrate that these biochemical responses as well as growth inhibition can be potentiated by co-treatment with the polyamine analogue DENSPM. With appropriate in vitro and in vivo optimization, these findings could lead to clinically relevant therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".