MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

RTOG 0315: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study to determine the efficacy of octreotide acetate in preventing or reducing the severity of chemoradiation-induced diarrhea in patients with anal or rectal cancer

2007· article· en· W2247083811 on OpenAlexaff
Babu Zachariah, J. James, Clement K. Gwede, Jaffer A. Ajani, Lisa Judy Chin, David Donath, B. L. Kane, Marvin Rotman, Lawrence Berk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboOctreotideClinical endpointDiarrheaInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgeryRandomized controlled trialSomatostatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4032 Background: Diarrhea is a common side effect of chemoradiation for pelvic malignancies. Octreotide acetate has been shown to control grade 3–4 chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in >90% of patients. The primary objective of this randomized placebo-controlled phase III study was to determine the efficacy of long acting octreotide acetate in preventing the onset of grade 2–4 diarrhea. Secondary objectives were to assess the impact of diarrhea on chemoradiation delivery and medical resource utilization. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with primary anal or rectal cancer, and scheduled to receive concurrent chemoradiation to a minimum dose of 45 Gy using pelvic field sizes greater than 10x10cm, were enrolled. Pts with history of pelvic radiotherapy, chronic bowel disease, diarrhea of grade ≥2, or colostomy were excluded from the study. Pts were stratified by RT dose (<50 Gy and ≥50 Gy), chemotherapy (bolus and continuous) and gender. Pts were randomized to receive two 30 mg intramuscular injections of octreotide acetate (Sandostatin LAR® Depot) or placebo. Injections were given between day -7 and day -4 and on day 22 (± 3 days) of RT. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 2, 3, or 4 diarrhea (CTCAE v3.0). Assuming a 45% placebo incidence rate, a one-sided chi-square test (alpha 0.05) would require 226 pts to detect a 42% reduction in incidence due to octreotide acetate. Results: The study accrued 233 pts (215 analyzable), 106 pts in the placebo arm and 109 pts in the octreotide acetate arm. The majority of pts (80%) on each arm had rectal cancer. There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of grade 2+ diarrhea (p=0.21) with 52 (49%) and 48 (44%) in the placebo and octreotide acetate treatment arms, respectively. There was also no statistically significant difference between the treatment arms in chemoradiation delivery or medical resource utilization. Conclusions: Prophylactic use of octreotide acetate was not shown to significantly reduce the incidence of mild, moderate or severe diarrhea. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas→French-language works237,207→