MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2252412663

Phase I/II study of CTCE-9908, a novel anticancer agent that inhibits CXCR4, in patients with advanced solid cancers

2007· article· en· W2252412663 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastién J. Hotte, Hal W. Hirte, Anne Iacobucci, Donald Wong, Lyne Cantin, Walter Korz, Wilson H. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCXCR4ToxicityCXCR4 antagonistMetastasisInternal medicinePharmacologyCancerReceptorOncologyCancer researchChemokine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A153 Introduction: CTCE-9908 is a 17 amino acid peptide CXCR4 antagonist that has been shown to block the interaction of the CXCR4 receptor with CXCL12 (SDF-1), critical in the infiltration of organ tissues by metastatic cells. CXCR4 receptors are expressed on many malignant cell types. SDF-1, the CXCR4 ligand is produced in large amounts by organs representing the first sites of metastasis for many malignant cell types. Recently, CXCR4 has also been shown to play a role in angiogenesis. CTCE-9908 is expected to be effective against a wide range of cancer types that express CXCR4 by inhibiting the metastatic process. This phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of CTCE-9908 in patients (pts) with refractory late-stage solid tumors.
 Patients and Methods: The agent was administered over 30 minutes, intravenously daily during weekdays for 20 doses in escalating doses to eligible pts using an accelerated titration design. Five dose levels (DLs) from 0.25mg/kg to 5.0mg/kg were planned. Twenty-two pts have been entered in 5 cohorts: DL 1 (0.25) - 2 pts; DL 2 (0.5) - 1 pt; DL 3 (1.0) - 4 pts; DL 4 (2.5) - 2 pts; DL 5 (5) - 13 pts. Twenty-one pts received study drug since one pt at DL1 progressed prior to starting treatment. DL 5 was expanded to obtain more information on toxicity and efficacy specific to pts with ovarian, breast, prostate and ‘other’ CXCR4-expressing cancers. Pts with stable disease (SD) or better after cycle 1 were eligible to receive further cycles. For 21 evaluable pts, median age was 56 years (range, 30-84), 62% were female. Primary tumor types: breast (6 pts), ovary (4 pts), lung (3 pts), melanoma (2 pts), others (6 pts).
 Results: Adverse event (AE) data are available for the first 21 pts. No pt had DLT. Most common drug-related toxicity consisted of grade 2 phlebitis (3pts), grade 2 gingivitis (2 pts) and grade 3 GGT elevation (1 pt). Of 20 pts assessable for response: PD (10), SD (5), N/A (5). Of the pts with SD after first cycle, 3 had ovarian cancer, 2 had breast cancer and 1 had small bowel cancer. Seven pts entered the continuation phase after cycle 1. One pt with small bowel cancer has now completed 4 cycles of therapy. One pt with ovarian cancer had a decrease in CA-125 from 657 to 303 after 1 cycle with a decrease in baseline target lesions but was found to have a brain metastasis not evaluated on screening, presumably from a concurrent breast cancer.
 Conclusions: CTCE-9908, an anticancer agent with a novel mechanism of action, is well tolerated and has shown preliminary signs of efficacy, especially in ovarian cancer. A phase II study is planned in that population. The expansion phase of the current trial continues and should complete accrual shortly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207