MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2253717179 · doi:10.1039/c5tx00358j

The influence of the SULT1A status – wild-type, knockout or humanized – on the DNA adduct formation by methyleugenol in extrahepatic tissues of mice

2016· article· en· W2253717179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdductSulfotransferaseDNA adductChemistryKidneyCaecumCarcinogenKnockout mouseSpleenInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryEnzymeMolecular biologyBiologyMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methyleugenol, present in herbs and spices, has demonstrated carcinogenic activity in the liver and, to a lesser extent, in extrahepatic tissues of rats and mice. It forms DNA adducts after hydroxylation and sulphation. As previously reported, hepatic DNA adduct formation by methyleugenol in mice is strongly affected by their sulphotransferase (SULT) 1A status. Now, we analysed the adduct formation in extrahepatic tissues. The time course of the adduct levels was determined in transgenic (tg) mice, expressing human SULT1A1/2, after oral administration of methyleugenol (50 mg per kg body mass). Nearly maximal adduct levels were observed 6 h after treatment. They followed the order: liver > caecum > kidney > colon > stomach > small intestine > lung > spleen. We then selected liver, caecum, kidney and stomach for the main study, in which four mouse lines [wild-type (wt), Sult1a1-knockout (ko), tg, and humanized (ko-tg)] were treated with methyleugenol at varying dose levels. In the liver, caecum and kidney, adduct formation was nearly completely dependent on the expression of SULT1A enzymes. In the liver, human SULT1A1/2 led to higher adduct levels than mouse Sult1a1, and the effects of both enzymes were approximately additive. In the caecum, human SULT1A1/2 and mouse Sult1a1 were nearly equally effective, again with additive effects in tg mice. In the kidney, only human SULT1A1/2 played a role: no adducts were detected in wt and ko mice even at the highest dose tested and the adduct levels were similar in tg and ko-tg mice. In the stomach, adduct formation was unaffected by the SULT1A status. IN CONCLUSION: (i) the SULT1A enzymes only affected adduct formation in those tissues in which they are highly expressed (mouse Sult1a1 in the liver and caecum, but not in the kidney and stomach; human SULT1A1/2 in the liver, caecum and kidney, not in the stomach of tg mice and humans), indicating a dominating role of local bioactivation; (ii) the additivity of the effects of both enzymes in the liver and caecum implies that the enzyme level was limiting in the adduct formation; (iii) SULT1A forms dominated the activation of methyleugenol in several tissues, but non-Sult1a1 forms or SULT-independent mechanisms were involved in its adduct formation in the stomach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it