MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2254619066 · doi:10.1093/protein/gzv044

Development and characterization of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase as a maltoheptaose-producing enzyme using site-directed mutagenesis

2015· article· en· W2254619066 on OpenAlexaff
Ye-Seul Koo, Hye‐Yeon Jeon, Hye-Jeong Choi, Woo‐Jae Choung, Jae‐Hoon Shim

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein Engineering Design and Selection · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHallym UniversityNational Research Foundation
KeywordsSaturated mutagenesisChemistryHydrolysisCyclodextrinEnzyme kineticsResidue (chemistry)MutagenesisEnzymeSite-directed mutagenesisStereochemistryMutantSubstrate (aquarium)Active siteDirected evolutionBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase; EC 2.4.1.19) mainly produces cyclodextrins (CDs) using linear maltooligosaccharides. We performed site-directed saturation mutagenesis on the +1 substrate-binding residue, H233, of CGTase from alkalophilic Bacillus sp. I-5 to prepare specific-length oligosaccharides. The obtained mutant CGTase, H233Y, primarily produced maltoheptaose (G7) using β-CD via a hydrolysis reaction. A kinetic study of H233Y showed that the kcat/Km value of β-CD was 7-fold greater than that of G7, which accounts for the accumulation of G7 during the H233Y enzyme reaction. A structure comparison of CGTases with H233Y modeling suggests that the substitution of H233Y may alter the position of the +1 subsite and slow the further hydrolysis of G7 after the ring-opening reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtein Engineering Design and SelectionSame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207