MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263078710

과학기술의 선진화를 위한 지표개발 연구

2010· article· ko· W2263078710 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이우성, 송치웅, 현성재

Bibliographic record

Venue정책연구 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicTechnology Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytic hierarchy processFuzzy logicIndex (typography)Computer scienceMathematicsOperations researchArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

연구의 필요성 및 목적○ 녹색성장과 신성장동력 확보 등 국정과제의 실천을 위해 정부 R&D투자 규모가 확대되면서 과학기술정책의 과학기반, 증거기반 정책수립에 대한 요구 증대 ○ OECD 등에서도 기존의 과학기술 지표와 통계를 벗어나 새로운 개념의 혁신, 성과의 측정, 전략을 위한 지표 개발에 대한 논의가 활발히 진행 ○ 정부 R&D 투자 및 관련 인프라 구축을 통해 국정과제를 효과적으로 실천하기 위해서는 이에 요구되는 정보 즉, 국가의 과학기술 선진화를 달성함에 있어 요구되는 의사결정에 유용한 지표와 통계의 개발 및 제시가 필요 주요 연구내용제2장 선진국의 과학기술지표 최근동향제1절 OECD NESTI제2절 UK Innovation Index제3절 Canada 과학기술혁신지표 제3장 과학기술지표 분석틀 설정과 우리나라 현황 파악제1절 기존의 과학기술지표 분석틀제2절 본 연구의 과학기술 지표 분석틀 설정제3절 우리나라의 과학기술 공식지표 현황분석제4절 기술혁신연구에서의 연구적 차원의 지표조사현황 분석제5절 소결 제4장 신규 과학기술혁신조사 후보지표 발굴제1절 신규 과학기술혁신조사의 후보지표 1차 선정제2절 신규과학기술조사 1차 후보지표 세부현황제3절 소결 제5장 신규 후보지표들의 우선순위 설정제1절 Fuzzy AHP 설문조사의 이론적 배경제2절 Fuzzy AHP 설문조사 개요제3절 Fuzzy AHP 설문조사 결과제4절 소결: 1차 후보지표들의 평가항목별 우선순위 제6장 과학기술지표 개발 로드맵

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue정책연구Same topicTechnology Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207