Fractionation of Selenium during Selenate Reduction by Granular Zerovalent Iron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Batch experiments were conducted using granular zerovalent iron (G-ZVI) with either ultrapure water or CaCO3 saturated simulated groundwater to assess the extent of Se isotope fractionation in solution under the anaerobic conditions characteristic of many aquifers. G-ZVI is a common remediation material in permeable reactive barriers (PRB) to treat Se-contaminated groundwater, and stable isotopes are a potential tool for assessing removal mechanisms. The solution composition, speciation of Se, and Se isotope ratios were determined during both sets of experiments. Dissolved Se concentrations decreased from 10 to <2 mg L(-1) after 3 d in the CaCO3 system and below 0.4 mg L(-1) after 2 d in the ultrapure water system. XANES analysis of the solid phase showed spectra consistent with the formation of Se(IV), Fe2(SeO3)3, FeSe, FeSe2, and Se(0) on the G-ZVI. Selenium isotope ratio measurements in solution in the CaCO3 and ultrapure water experiments showed enrichment of δ(82/76)Se values from -0.94 ± 0.07‰ and -1.93 ± 0.20‰ to maximum values of 6.85 ± 0.52‰ and 5.68 ± 0.20‰ over 72 and 36 h, respectively. The effective fractionations associated with the reduction of Se(VI) were 4.3‰ within the CaCO3 saturated water and 3.0‰ in ultrapure water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".