g2pDB: A Database Mapping Protein Post-Translational Modifications to Genomic Coordinates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large scale proteomics have made it possible to broadly screen samples for the presence of many types of post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination. This type of data has allowed the localization of these modifications to either a specific site on a proteolytically generated peptide or to within a small domain on the peptide. The resulting modification acceptor sites can then be mapped onto the appropriate protein sequences and the information archived. This paper describes the usage of a very large archive of experimental observations of human post-translational modifications to create a map of the most reproducible modification observations onto the complete set of human protein sequences. This set of modification acceptor sites was then directly translated into the genomic coordinates for the codons for the residues at those sites. We constructed the database g2pDB using this protein-to-codon site mapping information. The information in g2pDB has been made available through a RESTful-style API, allowing researchers to determine which specific protein modifications would be perturbed by a set of observed nucleotide variants determined by high throughput DNA or RNA sequencing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".