MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MEDI4736 in combination with tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

2015· article· en· W2273934916 on OpenAlexaff
Lillian L. Siu, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Frank Tsai, Aaron R. Hansen, Paul B. Robbins, Xia Li, Dominic W. Lai, John A. Blake-Haskins, Matthew G. Fury

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTremelimumabMedicineDurvalumabImmunogenicityImmunotherapyOncologyImmune checkpointAntigenInternal medicineIpilimumabCancer researchCancerImmunologyNivolumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS3090 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of SCCHN, the outlook for patients (pts) with R/M disease remains poor. Development of immunotherapies to treat this disease may hold promise. High mutational burden due to tobacco and expression of human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated viral antigens is linked to immunogenicity in SCCHN tumors. Despite this immunogenicity, tumors can evade immune detection by exploiting inhibitory checkpoints. PD-L1 is up-regulated on SCCHN tumors and is associated with antitumor T-cell response inhibition. MEDI4736 (M), a human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80 with high affinity and selectivity, has shown a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity in R/M SCCHN (ORR 24% in PD-L1+ pts, phase I)(Fury M, et al. Poster presented at ESMO 2014, 988PD). Tremelimumab (T), a selective human IgG2 mAb inhibitor of CTLA-4, has also shown antitumor activity in several tumor types (Tarhini AA. Immunotherapy 2013;5:215–29). Preclinical data suggest that combining anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 provides non-redundant immune checkpoint blockade and synergistic antitumor activity. Preliminary data for M + T in NSCLC show encouraging clinical activity in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative pts (Antonia S, et al. Poster presented at ESMO 2014, 1327P). Here we describe a study assessing the safety, efficacy, and potential biomarkers of response to M + T, in pts with R/M SCCHN. Methods: This is a phase I, multicenter, open-label study (NCT02262741) in pts (N~164) with R/M SCCHN deemed incurable by local therapy. The dose exploration phase will evaluate the combination of M + T, followed by dose expansion in treatment-naive or pretreated R/M pts. Pts will have PD-L1 status determined prior to dosing with M IV + T IV or T IV alone. The primary objective is to assess safety/tolerability of M + T and T alone. Secondary objectives are to assess antitumor activity via RECIST (including ORR, DCR, DoR, PFS, and OS), PK/PD, immunogenicity, and if clinical activity correlates with potential biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression, HPV status, and tobacco use. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02262741.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207