MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The CrkRS/CDK12 kinase is activated by a novel isoform of Cyclin K and phosphorylates the C‐terminal domain of RNA Pol II

2009· article· en· W2290369451 on OpenAlexaff
Gregg B. Morin, Michael A. Kuzyk, Jerry F. Tien, Emily K. Schaeffer, Siwei Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclin DCyclin-dependent kinase complexCyclin ACyclin A2Cyclin-dependent kinaseCyclinMolecular biologyCyclin-dependent kinase 9Cyclin BCell biologyCyclin EBiologyChemistryCyclin-dependent kinase 2KinaseBiochemistryCell cycleProtein kinase ACell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CrkRS (Cdc2‐related kinase, Arg/Ser), or CDK12 (Cyclin Dependent Kinase 12), is a ser/thr kinase believed to coordinate transcription and RNA splicing. While CrkRS complexes were known to phosphorylate the C‐Terminal Domain (CTD) of RNA Pol II, the responsible cyclin was not known. However, others showed that co‐expression of CrkRS and Cyclin L could affect the alternative splicing of a model substrate. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry (IP‐MS), we identified the protein constituents of endogenous CrkRS complexes. In addition to several spliceosome‐related proteins, we identified a novel 65 kDa isoform of Cyclin K, whereas the known isoform is 43 kDa. We did not observe Cyclin L. Previously, endogenous Cyclin K complexes were known to phosphorylate the CTD, yet the responsible kinase was not identified. Using yeast‐two hybrid and co‐expression experiments others identified CDK9 as a Cyclin K partner and that CDK9/Cyclin K could regulate transcription. Using IP‐MS, we show that Cyclin K complexes isolated from mammalian cells contain CrkRS but do not contain CDK9, and that CDK9 complexes contain Cyclin T1 and not Cyclin K, within detection limits. The co‐expression of CrkRS with either isoform of Cyclin K showed increased CTD kinase activity compared to controls. Our data suggest the primary cyclin partner for CrkRS is Cyclin K and that Cyclin K is sufficient to activate CrkRS to phosphorylate the CTD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→