Geochemical processes in the formation of ‘forest rings’: examples of reduced chimney formation in the absence of mineral deposits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest rings are large circular features common in boreal forests in Ontario, Canada, characterized by ring-shaped topographic depressions in carbonate-rich soil. This paper documents the compositional variation of soil and of the peat that commonly fills the depression, along transects across two representative rings: one centred on an accumulation of CH 4 in glacial sediments and the other on H 2 S in both glacial sediments and bedrock. Clayey mineral soil at the ring edge (annulus) shows low pH, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), Ca and carbonate, and high Al, Fe and Mn by both aqua regia digestion and a 0.25M hydroxylamine hydrochloride leach (0.25M NH 2 OH.HCl at 60 ° C). Antithetic responses occur in the overlying peat, including elevated carbonate and pH over the areas with low pH, ORP and carbonate in the mineral soil. The observed relationships suggest vertical migration of carbonate species from mineral soil into peat at the annulus, and lateral migration from the annulus to adjacent areas in the mineral soil. The geochemical data support the hypothesis that forest rings are the surface expression of reduced chimneys, similar to those observed over metallic mineral deposits, despite both these sites being known to be barren. Strongly negative ORP values in shallow soils in the annulus suggest autotrophic microbiological activity contributes to the sharp change in redox conditions at the ring boundaries. The similar geochemical responses at forest rings and soils over mineral deposits show that these features can be used to understand the variation in redox, pH, metals and soil hydrocarbons over mineral deposits and to help differentiate ore-related from secondary geochemical features due to the presence of a reduced chimney.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".