Heteroleptic arene Ru(<scp>ii</scp>) dipyrrinato complexes: DNA, protein binding and anti-cancer activity against the ACHN cancer cell line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four organometallic complexes [(η(6)-C6H6)RuCl(pmpzdpm)], 1; [(η(6)-C6H6)RuCl(pypzdpm)], 2; [(η(6)-C10H14)RuCl(pmpzdpm)], 3 and [(η(6)-C10H14)RuCl(pypzdpm)], 4 containing 5-(2-pyrimidyl-piperazine)phenyldipyrromethene (pmpzdpm) and 5-(2-pyridylpiperazine)phenyldipyrromethene (pypzdpm) have been designed and synthesized. The complexes 1-4 have been fully characterized by elemental analyses and spectroscopic studies (ESI-MS, IR, (1)H, (13)C NMR, UV-vis). Their electrostatic/intercalative interaction with CT DNA has been investigated by UV-vis and competitive ethidium bromide displacement studies while their protein binding affinity toward bovine serum albumin (BSA) was realized by UV-vis, fluorescence, synchronous and three dimensional (3D) fluorescence studies. The interaction with DNA and protein has further been validated by in silico studies. Cellular uptake, in vitro cytotoxicity and flow cytometric analyses have been performed to determine the mode of cell death against the kidney cancer cell line ACHN. Cell cycle analysis suggested that the complexes cause cell cycle arrest in the subG1 phase and overall results indicated that the in vitro antitumor activity of 1-4 lies in the order of 3 >4 >1 >2 (IC50, 7.0 1; 8.0 2; 2.0 3; 4.0 μM,4 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".