DESIGN OF FREQUENCY REGULATION SERVICE MARKET BASED ON PRICE AND DEMAND ELASTICITY BIDS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract –-- In this paper, an attempt has been made to establish a market mechanism for primary and secondary frequency regulation services in the restructured power system environment. The concept of elasticity of offer price and elasticity of offer quantity has been proposed. Such a design of offer structure helps the providers to respond to the system requirements based on the market price varia-tions in real-time. Optimization models are proposed for auctions that incorporate service provider maximum regu-lation constraints and Independent System Operator (ISO) requirements for total regulation while minimizing the total procurement cost of the ISO. The selected service providers in each area receive a uniform market price and regulation services are activated by frequency deviation linked- or Area Control Error (ACE) linked-price signals. The dynamic performances of the “elasticity ” based ser-vices are analyzed through the simulation of a two-step load perturbation to examine their regulation capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it