MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2307721566 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofu052.981

1435Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Real-time PCR Assay for the Rapid and Accurate Detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii from Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Samples

2014· article· en· W2307721566 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anshula Ambasta, Holly Williscroft, Deirdre L. Church

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchoalveolar lavageMedicinePneumocystis jiroveciiPathologyImmunologyVirologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Internal medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Pneumocystis jirovecii causes severe interstitial pneumonia called Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) among immunocompromised patients. Laboratory diagnosis of PcP currently relies on direct microscopic examination of respiratory specimens. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an in-house PCR Assay for the rapid, reliable, and accurate detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples. Methods. This study analyzed 92 BALF samples sent to Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS) between May 2011 and September 2012 for detection of P.jirovecii. DNA from the BALF samples was subjected to an in-house real-time PCR assay targeting the mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal RNA gene. Results were compared to the existing gold standard immunofluorescence assay (IFA) at CLS. Discrepant positive PCR samples were sent to St. Paul's hospital (SPH, Vancouver) for repeat PCR testing through their in-house PCR assay. Test characteristics were re-calculated using a modified gold standard that defined a positive test as one that was positive through both PCR assays in an immunocompromised patient. Results. Results: 54% of the samples were derived from immunosuppressed patients. The immunosuppressed samples included those with HIV (18%), malignancies (28%), solid-organ transplants (46%), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (4%), and others (4%). 13 of the 92 samples tested positive with the IFA at CLS. The in-house PCR assay identified an additional 7 positive samples, besides confirming the positivity of the previous 13 samples. Using the IFA as the available gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PCR assay was 100%, 91%, 65%, and 100% respectively. The 7 additional positive samples were subsequently confirmed as true positives through an independent PCR assay at SPH. Using the modified gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PCR assay were all 100%. In comparison, the IFA had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 65%, 100%, 100%, and 91%, respectively Conclusion. The in-house real-time PCR assay aids in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of PcP from BALF samples, with a considerable increase in sensitivity as compared to the currently existing IFA at CLS. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicPneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatmentFrench-language works237,207