MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthesis of Potent .ALPHA.v.BETA.3/.ALPHA.IIb.BETA.3 Dual Antagonists Tricyclic Pharmacophore-based Molecules and Their Selectivity Control

2008· article· en· W2313442542 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Minoru Ishikawa, Dai Kubota, Katsuhiro Ajito

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Synthetic Organic Chemistry Japan · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacophoreIn vivoAntagonistChemistryPharmacologyStereochemistryCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryReceptorMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The blockade of αIIbβ3 binding to fibrinogen is known to provide a potent antiplatelet activity. We have focused on the adhesion and migration of integrin αβ3in vascular smooth muscle cells and leucocytes. An injectable αβ3 dual antagonist would be a novel drug candidate for acute ischemic diseases. For the molecular design of novel non-peptide integrin ββ3 antagonists, we focused on spatial screening and mimetics of the RGD tripeptide, which was a key recognition site. The first piperazine analogue (4) exhibited strong αIIbβ3 activity, and replacement of piperazine by 4-aminopiperidine afforded the 6alpha;β3/βIIbβ3 dual antagonist (30). Paying attention to enhancement of activity and improvement of solubility, optimization of 30 gave some preliminary candidates modified at the central aromatic or the C-terminus. Backup compounds possessing the (3S)-aminopiperidine moiety with further improvement of solubility were synthesized. These preliminary candidates exhibited preferable ADME in rats, and some of them showed acceptable water solubility, which did not provide detectable toxicity in vitro or in mice. We also generated αβ3 selective antagonists with tricyclic pharmacophore, in order to prove that in vivo efficacy of the dual antagonist was superior to that of the avf33 selective antagonist. Finally, excellent in vivo efficacy of the candidate (81) was demonstrated in both canine ACS and PTCA models by independent groups. Regarding development of 81, a partnership was established in 2006, and a clinical trial of 81 is now being prepared in the US and Canada. The selection of an integrin research program, strategies for competing with big pharmaceutical companies, and speedy medicinal chemistry are also described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Synthetic Organic Chemistry JapanSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207