Generic, Metal-Free Cross-Linking and Modification of Silicone Elastomers Using Click Ligation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Silicone elastomers are widely used in a variety of biomaterials applications. Their high hydrophobicity can, in some cases, compromise their utility. There exist few convenient, efficient and metal-free processes to introduce hydrophilic groups onto the elastomer surface. We describe the utilization of the metal-free click reaction between azido- and alkynyl-modified silicones to both cross-link and functionalize silicone elastomers. Initial cross-linking at, optionally, reduced or elevated temperatures depending on the alkyne used, results in elastomers whose moduli and tackiness can be controlled by manipulation of cross-link density through use of different chain length constituents: the systematic capping of azides on the azide-rich partner provides a level of control of both cross-linking and residual functionality after cross-linking. The residual azides or alkynes resulting from nonstoichiometric mixing of the starting materials can be used for sequential functionalization of the elastomer as shown through the improved wettability that results from the grafting of alkyne-functional PEG to azide-rich silicone elastomers: contact angles decrease from ∼105° for the pure silicone elastomers to 85° for the azide-rich silicone elastomer, and to as low as 41° for the PEG-modified product. It is possible to modify the entire elastomer body or only the surface by judicious choice of the solvent used for the hydrophilic modification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".