MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2316261099 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-247

Abstract 247: ADAR1 promotes malignant progenitor reprogramming in chronic myeloid leukemia.

2013· article· en· W2316261099 on OpenAlexaff
Qingfei Jiang, Leslie Crews, Christian Barrett, Angela Court-Recart, Daniel Goff, Anil Sadarangani, Jessica M. Rusert, Sheldon Morris, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein, Hye-Jung E. Chun, Marco A. Marra, Kelly Fraser, Kim‐Hien Dao, Mark D. Minden, Catriona Jamieson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprogrammingMyeloid leukemiaBiologyProgenitor cellCancer researchSmall hairpin RNAStem cellMyeloidLeukemiaGene knockdownImmunologyCell biologyGeneticsCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The molecular etiology of human progenitor reprogramming into self-renewing leukemia stem cells (LSC) has remained elusive. While DNA sequencing has uncovered spliceosome gene mutations that promote alternative splicing and portend leukemic transformation, isoform diversity may also be generated by RNA editing mediated by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes that regulate stem cell maintenance. In this study, whole transcriptome sequencing of normal, chronic phase (CP) and serially transplantable blast crisis (BC) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) progenitors revealed increased interferon-γ pathway gene expression in concert with BCR-ABL amplification, enhanced expression of the interferon responsive ADAR1 p150 isoform and a propensity for increased A-to-I RNA editing during CML progression. Lentiviral overexpression experiments demonstrate that ADAR1 p150 promoted expression of the myeloid transcription factor PU.1 and induced malignant reprogramming of myeloid progenitors. Moreover, enforced ADAR1 p150 expression was associated with production of a mis-spliced form of GSK3β implicated in LSC self-renewal. Finally, functional serial transplantation and shRNA studies demonstrate that ADAR1 knockdown impaired in vivo self-renewal capacity of BC CML progenitors. Together these data provide a compelling rationale for developing ADAR1-based LSC detection and eradication strategies. Citation Format: Qingfei Jiang, Leslie A. Crews, Christian L. Barrett, Angela Court-Recart, Daniel Goff, Anil Sadarangani, Jessica Rusert, Sheldon Morris, Lawrence Goldstein, Hye-Jung Chun, Marco Marra, Kelly Fraser, Kim-Hien Dao, Mark Minden, Catriona Jamieson. ADAR1 promotes malignant progenitor reprogramming in chronic myeloid leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 247. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-247

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207