MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319239155 · doi:10.1139/gen-2013-0127

Amplifying long transcripts of ryanodine receptors of five agricultural pests by transcriptome analysis and gap filling

2013· article· en· W2319239155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yonglei Liu, Muhammad Faisal Shahzad, Lan Zhang, Fei Li, Kejian Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars
KeywordsRyanodine receptorBiologyChilo suppressalisDiamondback mothComplementary DNAGeneRYR1InsectGeneticsTranscriptomePlutellaReceptorGene expressionBotanyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ryanodine receptor (RyR) is an intracellular calcium release channel that plays a key role in excitation contraction coupling. Insect RyR is the target of diamide insecticides. Better understanding of insect RyR is necessary for studying the molecular mode of action and potential resistance mechanism of diamide insecticides. However, molecular manipulation of the full RyR gene is difficult because of its length (approximately 15 kb). At present, RyR genes have been reported only in a limited number of insects. Here, we developed an efficient strategy to amplify full-length transcripts of insect RyR genes. First, we searched the transcriptomes of five insects, Bemisia tabaci, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Chilo suppressalis, Laodelphgax striatellus, and Plutella xylostella, yielding 85 RyR contigs in total. Second, the relative positions of these contigs in RyR transcripts were determined by aligning them with 12 well-annotated RyRs. Third, we designed primers to fill gaps between contigs and used rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) to amplify both 5'- and 3'-ends. Last, we assembled all fragments into long transcripts. As a result, full-length transcripts of three insects, C. suppressalis, L. striatellus, and P. xylostella, were obtained. The RyR transcript of B. tabaci was near full length, containing an intact ORF. Northern blot analysis indicated that RyR genes were expressed in all five insects. Sequence analyses showed that the amplified insect segments contained typical RyRs characteristics, such as EF-hand, motif GVRAGGGIGD, and six transmembrane domains. Seven lepidopteran-specific amino acid residues were found to be located in the C-terminal region of RyR proteins, which might be associated with the specificity of RyRs to diamide insecticides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207