Square-Planar Cu(II) Diketiminate Complexes in Lactide Polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cu(OiPr)2 was reacted with several β-diketimine ligands, nacnac(R)H. Sterically undemanding ligands with N-benzyl substituents afforded the dimeric heteroleptic complexes [nacnac(Bn)Cu(μ-OiPr)]2 and [3-Cl-nacnac(Bn)Cu(μ-OiPr)]2 (Bn = benzyl). With sterically more demanding amines, dimerization was not possible, and the putative nacnacCuOiPr intermediate underwent ligand exchange to the homoleptic bisdiketiminate complexes Cu(nacnac(ipp))2 and Cu(nacnac(Naph))2 (ipp = 2-isopropylphenyl, Naph = 1-napthyl). Homoleptic complexes were also prepared with N-benzyl ligands to yield Cu(nacnac(Bn))2 and Cu(3-succinimido-nacnac(Bn))2. All complexes were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Even bulkier ligands with N-anthrylmethyl, N-mesitylmethyl, or N-methylbenzyl substituents failed to react with Cu(OiPr)2. In the case of nacnac(dipp)CuOiPr, putative nacnac(dipp)CuOiPr decomposed by β-hydride elimination. Heteroleptic complexes [nacnac(Bn)Cu(μ-OiPr)]2 and [3-Cl-nacnac(Bn)Cu(μ-OiPr)]2 are very highly active rac-lactide polymerization catalysts, with complete monomer conversion at ambient temperature in solution in 0.5-5 min. In the presence of free alcohol, the homoleptic complexes seem to be in equilibrium with small amounts of the respective heteroleptic complex, which are sufficient to complete polymerization in less than 60 min at room temperature. All catalysts show high control of the polymerization with polydispersities of 1.1 and below. The obtained polymers were essentially atactic, with a slight heterotactic bias at ambient temperature and at -17 °C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".