MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319277815 · doi:10.1097/mpa.0b013e31829fcf35

Issues in the Design and Analysis of a Small External Validation Study

2013· letter· en· W2319277815 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gary S. Collins, Yannick Le Manach

Bibliographic record

VenuePancreas · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiostatisticsEpidemiologyClinical epidemiologyPublic healthMedicineFamily medicineMEDLINELibrary scienceMedical educationPolitical scienceNursingPathologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom [email protected] Departments of Anesthesia and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University Population Health Research Institute Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.773
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.860
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.7730.860
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePancreasSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207