Construction of (CuX)<sub>2<i>n</i></sub> Cluster-Containing (X = Br, I; <i>n</i> = 1, 2) Coordination Polymers Assembled by Dithioethers ArS(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub><i>m</i></sub>SAr (Ar = Ph, <i>p</i>-Tol; <i>m</i> = 3, 5): Effect of the Spacer Length, Aryl Group, and Metal-to-Ligand Ratio on the Dimensionality, Cluster Nuclearity, and the Luminescence Properties of the Metal–Organic Frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction of CuI with bis(phenylthio)propane in a 1:1 ratio yields the two-dimensional coordination polymer [{Cu(μ(2)-I)(2)Cu}{μ-PhS(CH(2))(3)SPh}(2)](n) (1). The 2D-sheet structure of 1 is built up by dimeric Cu(2)I(2) units, which are connected via four bridging 1,3-bis(phenylthio)propane ligands. In contrast, treatment of 2 equiv of CuI with 1,3-bis(phenylthio)propane in MeCN solution affords in a self-assembly reaction the strongly luminescent metal-organic 2D-coordination polymer [Cu(4)I(4){μ-PhS(CH(2))(3)Ph}(2)](n) (2), in which cubane-like Cu(4)(μ(3)-I)(4) cluster units are linked by the dithioether ligands. The crystallographically characterized one-dimensional (1D) compound [{Cu(μ(2)-Br)(2)Cu}{μ-PhS(CH(2))(3)SPh}(2)](n) (3) is obtained using CuBr. The outcome of the reaction of PhS(CH(2))(5)SPh with CuI also depends of the metal-to-ligand ratio employed. Mixing CuI and the dithioether in a 2:1 ratio results in formation of [Cu(4)I(4){μ-PhS(CH(2))(5)Ph}(2)](n) (4) in which cubane-like Cu(4)(μ(3)-I)(4) clusters are linked by the bridging dithioether ligand giving rise to a 1D necklace structure. A ribbon-like 1D-polymer with composition [{Cu(μ(2)-I)(2)Cu}{μ-PhS(CH(2))(5)SPh}(2)](n) (5), incorporating rhomboid Cu(2)I(2) units, is produced upon treatment of CuI with 1,5-bis(phenylthio)pentane in a 1:1 ratio. Reaction of CuBr with PhS(CH(2))(5)SPh produces the isomorphous 1D-compound [{Cu(μ(2)-Br)(2)Cu}{μ-PhS(CH(2))(5)SPh}(2)](n) (6). Strongly luminescent [Cu(4)I(4){μ-p-TolS(CH(2))(5)STol-p}(2)](n) (7) is obtained after mixing 1,5-bis(p-tolylthio)pentane with CuI in a 1:2 ratio, and the 2D-polymer [{Cu(μ(2)-I)(2)Cu}(2){μ-p-TolS(CH(2))(5)STol-p}(2)](n) (8) results from reaction in a 1:1 metal-to-ligand ratio. Under the same reaction conditions, 1D-polymeric [{Cu(μ(2)-Br)(2)Cu}{μ-p-TolS(CH(2))(5)STol-p}(2)](n) (9) is formed using CuBr. This study reveals that the structure of the self-assembly process between CuX and ArS(CH(2))(m)SAr ligands is hard to predict. The solid-state luminescence spectra at 298 and 77 K of 2 and 4 exhibit very strong emissions around 535 and 560 nm, respectively, whereas those for 1 and 5 display weaker ones at about 450 nm. The emission lifetimes are longer for the longer wavelength emissions (>1.0 μs arising from the cubane species) and shorter for the shorter wavelength ones (<1.4 μs arising from the rhomboid units). The Br-containing species are found to be weakly fluorescent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".