Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of four-hour intravenous infusions of eritoran in healthy Japanese and Caucasian men
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eritoran, a synthetic analogue of lipid A, has been shown to bind to TLR4/MD-2 complex and thereby block the interaction of endotoxins with TLR4. We report here the results of a study conducted to assess the single-dose safety and tolerability, as well as the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, of eritoran infusion in Japanese and Caucasian healthy adult men. Sixty-four men (aged 20-45 years; body mass index 18-30 kg/m(2)) were randomized into four groups: 4-mg total dose (six Japanese and six Caucasian men); 12-mg total dose (12 Japanese and 12 Caucasian men); 28-mg total dose (six Japanese and six Caucasian men); and placebo (eight Japanese and eight Caucasian men). Eritoran in single doses up to 28 mg over 4 h was well tolerated, with no apparent ethnic differences noted. Plasma concentrations were slightly higher in Japanese versus Caucasian men; these differences were not significant after adjustment for differences in body mass (clearance: approximately 1.2 ml/h/kg; volume of distribution at steady state: approximately 0.07 l/kg). The ex vivo endotoxin inhibitory activity of eritoran was similar in Japanese and Caucasian men. The data do not indicate any need for clinical dose adjustment for possible ethnic-based differences in drug distribution or metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it