Sequence and comparative analysis of the<i>MIP</i>gene in Chinese straw mushroom,<i>Volvariella volvacea</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mitochondrial intermediate peptidase (MIP) gene is conserved in fungi. It is linked closely with the mating-type A (mtA) gene. In this study, a fragment of the MIP gene in Volvariella volvacea (Bull. ex Fr.) Singer was first cloned by homologue-based cloning technology. Subsequently, the entire MIP DNA sequence (PYd21-MIP) was obtained after the fragment was compared with the genomic data through BLAST analysis. The PYd21-MIP sequence appeared to be homologous with the MIP gene in other fungi. Phylogenetic analysis of PYd21-MIP and other MIP sequences from diverse fungi agreed with the current organism phylogeny. Analysis of protein domains by InterProScan software and motif searching demonstrated that PYd21-MIP encodes a homologous MIP protein. These data support the hypothesis that the PYd21-MIP protein is a Hog-MIP protein homologue from V. volvacea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".