The Impact of Helium Co-Implantation on Hydrogen Induced Donor Profiles in Float Zone Silicon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Doping profiles in proton and helium co-implanted and annealed n-type float zone silicon wafers are analyzed by means of spreading resistance measurements. After annealing at sufficiently high temperatures and/or long-enough duration, the hydrogen-related donor profiles known from proton implantations are significantly enhanced by the helium irradiation. The resulting profile shape exhibits a strong resemblance to the radiation damage distribution of the co-implantation. By increasing the ultimately introduced num-ber of hydrogen related donors without varying the available amount of hydrogen, it is shown that the donor profile resulting from proton implantation and annealing is limited by the defect species and the implanted hydrogen is supplied in surplus. The maximum of the additionally induced donor distribution by the he-lium implantation shows a different dependency on the fluence compared to the donor maximum induced by mere proton irradia-tion. The diffusion of protons through the irradiated layer during annealing is impacted by the He-irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".