MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

2014· article· en· W2325931607 on OpenAlexaff
Tíffany Abitbol, Heera S. Marway, Emily D. Cranston

Bibliographic record

VenueNordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBromideSurface modificationCelluloseNanocrystalChemical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryPolymer chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis of cotton were surface modified with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Essentially, the counterions of the CNC surface sulfate ester groups are exchanged for cetyltrimethylammonium (CTA+), which acts as a bulky, amphiphilic cation. The CTAB-modified CNCs were thoroughly purified to remove surfactant that was nonelectrostatically bound. The surface modification could be tailored from 50 to 100% charge coupling efficiency by varying the reaction conditions. The main factor that influenced coupling efficiency was ionic strength; increasing the ionic strength screened electrostatic interactions, which led to decreased surfactant adsorption. Adsorption isotherms of CTAB on model CNC films, measured by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, indicated an increase in adsorbed surfactant amount with increasing bulk CTAB concentration without achieving saturation in the concentration range studied. CTABmodified CNCs were unstable in water but formed stable colloidal suspensions in ethanol, which transitioned into a continuous gel-like chiral nematic liquid crystal at relatively low concentrations (~4 wt. %) but did not phase separate into isotropic and anisotropic phases. The particle size and morphology of the CTAB-modified CNCs were unchanged compared to the native CNCs but were more thermally stable and less hydrophilic after the surface modification reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNordic Pulp & Paper Research JournalSame topicAdvanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and GeometryFrench-language works237,207