MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328555831 · doi:10.1021/ef200098y

Experimental Investigation of Production Characteristics of the Gravity-Assisted Inert Gas Injection (GAIGI) Process for Recovery of Waterflood Residual Oil: Effects of Wettability Heterogeneity

2011· article· en· W2328555831 on OpenAlexaff
Rafat Parsaei, Ioannis Chatzis

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous mediumResidual oilWettingHomogeneousSaturation (graph theory)Petroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryPorosityInertMaterials scienceMineralogyGeologyChemistryComposite materialThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of reservoir heterogeneities in terms of wettability at the macroscopic scale on the recovery efficiency of the gravity-assisted inert gas injection (GAIGI) process was investigated through a systematic experimental study for tertiary recovery of waterflood residual oil. Isolated inclusions of oil-wet consolidated glass beads were embedded in a continuum of unconsolidated water-wet glass beads to create heterogeneous packed columns. In comparison to water-wet homogeneous porous media, such heterogeneous media allowed us to establish higher waterflood residual oil saturation whose amount varied linearly with the volume fraction of oil-wet heterogeneities in the packing. Experimental results obtained from tertiary gravity drainage experiments demonstrated that the continuity of water-wet portions of the heterogeneous porous medium facilitates the tertiary oil recovery through the film flow mechanism, provided that the oil-spreading coefficient is positive. In addition, owing to the high waterflood residual oil content of the heterogeneous media tested, the oil bank formation occurred much earlier and grew faster, resulting in a higher oil recovery factor. However, having favorable wettability conditions in homogeneous porous media resulted in slightly lower reduced residual oil saturation after the GAIGI process compared to that in the heterogeneous media with the same condition of withdrawal rate. A relationship between the oil recovery factor at gas breakthrough and gravity number was developed for the heterogeneous and homogeneous media. The recovery factor at gas breakthrough versus gravity number in homogeneous media follows a similar trend as that of homogeneous water-wet porous media. However, at a given gravity number, the recovery factor of heterogeneous media was greater than that of the homogeneous media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207